Ratings based on 11 Verified Reviews

2.4 out of 5
17% of guests recommend
3.1 Room cleanliness
2.5 Service & staff
3.2 Room comfort
3.0 Hotel condition
Expedia Verified Reviews
1 out of 5
by A verified traveler

This traveler left a rating score only Posted 23 May 2021
5 out of 5
by A verified traveler

Superb

Posted 23 Feb 2020 on Hotels
Beautiful, clean, tidy, spacious. Easy to find, great location
3 out of 5
by A verified traveler

Looks can be deceiving!!!

Posted 14 Oct 2018 on Hotels
Bad location in the way of the actual studio in the apartment complex itself - was facing the street and a round about and invading the privacy of surrounding homes . False advertising as it’s called Sutton’s Beach so we expected the balcony to be facing the beach for views that were presented in the brochure .
3 out of 5
by A verified traveler

Apartment

Posted 17 Aug 2017 on Wotif
The apartment and bed was comfortable and the apartment was nice and clean. You'd never want to use the BBQ. It was ancient and rusty. No service as it's not staffed. The booking added on a credit card surcharge that we did not see online and the receipt did not include it!
Comment from Hotel Management
19 Aug 2017 by John Beal, Hotel Management
Hi Anonymous, Thank you for your review. We will check the BBQ you mentioned. The property is a holiday accommodation unit in a private building. as it is not a motel it does not have facilities like staffed onsite reception or room service. these details and applicable credit card surcharges are advertised on the websites and in our initial e-mail to you. The initial email gives guests the option to avoid credit card fees with the use of internet banking directly to our trust account or even cash upon arrival if you prefer. We will certainly attend to the BBQ but feel the other items you mentioned have been explained above. Kindest regards, John Beal
2 out of 5
by A verified traveler

No stove, no oven and not enough toilet paper.

Posted 28 Dec 2016 on Wotif
Pros: No pool - for the money it is not up to the standard of Redcliffe
Cons: Put a pool on the roof top, add a stove and oven and leave enough toilet paper. Way too expensive for what it has to offer.
It was a place to sleep too small - this is a bed sit not a one bedroom with very little views.
2 out of 5
by A verified traveler from Sunshine Coast Australia

Not what is shown on web site

Posted 14 Nov 2016 on Wotif
Pros: It was a good size room, good location and had secure parking.
Cons: The booking in process as I didn`t receive all the information on that process. It is advertised as Sutton Beach Apartments but the actual complex is a different name being Arena On Sydney. The contact phone number provided to me along with booking details via SMS when try to call that number it said it was disconnected. The room was tidy but not clean, stove/cook top was greasy, BBQ still had onion on it and was rusty, the soap holder in bathroom was broken and the windows were extremely dirty along with balcony glass. I have stay in many, many places over my years and I was very disappointed in this especially considering the cost to stay there, I have never paid that much for one night before and I would defiantely rate it as the lowest I`ve stayed based on value for money.
Location: The location of Redcliffe and nearby activities were fantastic, beautiful place to stay.
2 out of 5
by A verified traveler from qld

Posted 13 Nov 2016 on Wotif
Pros: The bed was good, but mostly the unit was outdated. Trouble getting key for room & the units are not called sittings beach apartments at all, very confusing.
Cons: Access to a key to get in was bad, no office at units, no one at real estate, took us 1 1/2 hours to actually check in.
Location: Position was convenient to pippels on the beach.
1 out of 5
by A verified traveler from k

avoidance

Posted 3 Oct 2016 on Wotif
Filthy. Definitely not value for money, then had to justify to the agent that I was telling truth via photos. Hair all over floor, in cutlery draws, dirty clothes incl knickers in dresser. Shop around you can do a whole lot better.
3 out of 5
by A verified traveler

Posted 21 Sep 2016 on Hotels
The name of the premises on the web-site is different from that on the building
3 out of 5
by A verified traveler

It was good

Posted 2 Aug 2016 on Hotels
It was nice